Ruger GP100. Ruger GP100. The only logical solution is to get one of each. The better a weapon feels in your hands/ or arms with long guns/shotguns. Buy the GP100. And, we suppose, they’re more fun to photograph when they look different, plus the fact that a blued Ruger GP100 was easier to find than a stainless one, so one’s silver and one’s black. Just one opinion from an old Purple Heart grunt. As unpopular as this opinion might be, it is nonetheless mine that both of these revolvers are excellent and evenly matched in every essential category. 94%. And consumers like to hear about the next big thing. Longer barreled models with tuned actions can take full advantage of the .357 Magnum and give great performance as a hunting or home-defense gun. If one was to conceive of an excellent all-purpose fullsize revolver today, what would it look like? Not a tremendous advantage, but worth mentioning. Hammer spurs on both are well knurled, and easy to grasp. In general if it feels GREAT and is reliable, consistent, and accurate, and works for you, I have to say if it is not broke it does not need fixing! However, the Ruger action can be cleaned up significantly, and will improve through repeated use. This is thanks to a clever spring loaded plunger arrangement, allowing a quick and simple change of front sight. In both cases we found the Blazer ammo to be very controllable and the Winchester to be the least predictable. Back in the 80s, the 686 beat the socks off of the GP-100 and my Security-Six! The GP100 trigger is approximately the same weight, but the travel is a little longer and feels heavier, with noticeable stacking about 2/3 of the way through the travel, with a little snag near the end in double-action, and a slightly gritty single-action break. While it is the rare revolver whose parts require no fitting and adjustment for proper function, the design of the Ruger makes repair and correction of issues somewhat easier. Other than say going from a single shot to something else for example. I have a question about Colt and the Pythons………..I have heard that at least for a short while Colt was producing some Pythons with internal parts that were subject to breakage. and the accuracy is Unlike the traditionally-designed Smith 686, the frame of the Ruger terminates in a rectangular block housing a coil mainspring assembly, which is as Ruger as it gets: it’s cheaper than shaping the frame to the grip, but it also means that a grip of any shape is possible as long as it’s larger than the frame, the manufacturing shortcut thereby being turned into an advantage for the user. For some reason, in the early eighties, there was a pervasive belief that the 110 JHP was the ultimate manstopper; later testing did not bear this theory out but it’s still a cool round and deserves a place in any collector’s heart. Bass Pro Shops $749.99 See Deal Ruger GP100. At 15 yards, performance was so similar as to be ridiculous. The components of the action, while far from crude, lack the precise fitment and polish of the Smith and Wesson, but are similarly overbuilt like the rest of the gun. Both guns were bought used, with our own cash, the sellers having no ties to the manufacturers. Back in the day, S&W had better triggers than Ruger. What did we learn? Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. It would also be very accurate, and have an action that would be hard-wearing, and would maintain its smooth, manageable trigger over a long time. This gun marks an … August 26, 2017. Models with short barrels, aggressively textured grips and combat sights are available from either maker, and would be fine guns for general concealed carry. The differences in feel were pure hair splitting, though. The factory ammo was from American Eagle, Blazer, and Winchester. Sights vary on these guns depending on the model, but both can accept aftermarket front and rear sights, with the GP100 having a small perk here due to its easily uninstalled front sight. But that’s about it. If you are not shooting a constant diet of barn-burning maximum pressure loads through the gun, does it confer any benefit? The American Eagle was a solid performer and for general purpose applications we’d recommend it on account of the combination of bullet, accuracy, and reloadable brass. For the tinkerer without real gunsmithing skills, the GP100 may be a better choice, as detail disassembly and reassembly is somewhat simpler than the classic Smith and Wesson revolvers. That’s why Rugers weigh more than do corresponding S&W handguns and that’s why Rugers are more rugged than are S&W’s. For more than 70 years, Ruger … Posted by 5 years ago. The six inch edition is virtually identical to the Classic Hunter in size and weight; with identical grips there would be no discernible difference in size and the weight discrepancy is a matter of grams. The Smith trigger feels slightly heavier and smoother, and the gun itself seems to absorb recoil a tiny bit better, although whether this is down to the factory Hogue grips we couldn’t say. I once had the opportunity to compare both the GP100 and 686 with 4in barrels, firing both from bench rests in single-action mode at known distance targets at 25 and 50 yards. Bill Ruger said he never made a dime on the Security-Six and I believe it. But when the scores are that close, tracing any difference to the gun rather than the shooter is almost certainly a mistake. But over the past 10-15 years S&W quality appears to have decreased. It would be first durable, and reliable, have 6 or 7 shots, and be chambered in .357 Magnum, allowing the use of .38 Specials, of course. The somewhat rougher trigger of the GP100 is a hindrance for fast, precise double-action work, though, and makes that accuracy potential harder to realize. They even have the same twist rate: 1:18.75”. After “about” 500 rounds of magnum 357’s, I can “usually or normally” do 3 inch groups at 30 yards. But because IF I am out in the middle of nowhere and everything I have with me I need to trust it will not break and is pretty much MISTER MURPHY Proof! Since I’ve had my S&W 686, 3 of my buddies traded their Rugers for S&W 686. I think it was the best .357 Ruger ever made. This applies to handguns, long guns shotguns……whatever. The Ruger GP100 GP-141 38 Special +P/357 Magnum, $480, is the fourth 4-inch handgun in the test.The GP100 line was introduced in 1985 as a second generation of the Ruger double-action, exposed-hammer revolvers intended to replace Ruger’s … If you’re thinking of buying the new Ruger … But we’ll do our best not to drool all over it. Like the Glock 19, it is easier to maneuver indoors. That’s why Rugers are heavier and that’s why they’re more durable and better than S&W’S…. Is either superior to the other, or is this one of the classic “six of one, half dozen of the other” arguments? And if you guys think the GP-100 is as accurate as the 1980’s S&W 686, I suggest you buy your guns at a gun store, do a test and give us real data. Your email address will not be published. But the Ruger GP100 is legendarily durable, and the accuracy of each gun is so similar that the overwhelming majority of shooters will never notice a difference. The Ruger launched four Blazer rounds into three-quarters of an inch before we (rather annoyingly) got spooked by the success and sent the last two an inch left. Those guns of mine are very smooth because of dry firing. The S&W will typically have a better trigger and accuracy, however the Ruger will probably win out in durability. Like the 686, it is made of stainless steel. A battle of the Titans so to speak. The new GP100 Match Champion is Ruger’s first direct attempt at challenging that dominance. The GP100 is a 6 shot, medium frame .357 comparable to the S&W L frame 686. Ruger’s GP-100 revolver is a beefy magnum pistol that brings some unique capabilities to the table. If you don’t care to immediately start modifying a new gun in order to enjoy the benefits of a nice action, the 686 would be the better choice, or you would be best advised to purchase an upgraded GP100. The SP101 is a small frame, 5 shot comparable to the J frame 60. I like the gun and it shoots well. Maybe it’s just me, but I’m not seeing it. We put nine B-2 targets on each backing board and went to work, shooting reloads, factory ammo, and then unwinding each time with casual fire through a reference pistol – in this case the FNS-9 we’ve been using for long term testing. In retrospect, choosing two extremely similar revolvers and putting them head-to-head had a predictable outcome: they’re extremely similar. Their balance superb, and I wouldn’t swap one for a GP-100, ever. By entering your e-mail you consent to subscribe to my newsletter. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. We began by warming up with handloads as we can make them by the case lot; using cast lead semi-wadcutter 148 grain bullets and titegroup powder they’re practically free. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… Personally, I believe the Ruger brand is top notch and at the end of the day, they are both glorious weapons. $572.00 - $617.00 See Deal GunCritic Score More Info. Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686 as a first revolver? The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. It features a sideplate on the stainless-steel frame which is removed for service and disassembly, a conventional grip arrangement, and a flat mainspring. Geordie Pickard. The Smith 686 liked the American Eagle more, putting six rounds into one and five-eighths inches. Were Smith triggers better in the past, All the guns I’m talking about are new? The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. Bearcat: Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:56 pm Posts: 43 From a novice doing his … This is admittedly a small sample size, but my research and experience with other examples of each has solidified my opinion that both guns will shoot equally well with appropriate loads. Even in this age of the polymer striker-fired pistol, the wheelgun endures, and the two discussed here are among the very finest for serious shooters. Perhaps, but being rugged has limitations. They’re rugged, durable and they don’t need to be strengthened to last forever. S&W 586 is my preferred revolver. A very nice revolver, but not as smooth or refined as my 586. For whatever it’s worth; all four of us are at least 70 years old and are all Vietnam Combat Veteran’s. Comparing the triggers of tuned variants of either will reveal excellent, smooth, light double-action pulls, and shiveringly short and crisp single-action breaks. getting better…… Love both of these Revolvers!!! I have a S&W Model 19 357 Mag with a 4" barrel. These two icons of the American revolver are in truth so closely matched as to be two sides of the same coin. That’s why Ruger revolvers weigh more than S&W revolvers and it’s also why Rugers are stronger guns….. The S&W 686 fired its best with the Blazer, putting all six in two and seven-eighths inches. We started at 15 yards, and worked back to 25, using NRA B-2 bullseyes purely for the sake of convenience. Bottom line, S&W won the accuracy prize back when it first came out. If you prefer the no-nonsense design of the GP100 or the timeless, refined mechanism of the 686, both are deserving of your dollar, and your trust. 03-25 … If you ever get into the content business, whether it’s online, in print, or in TV, you’ll realize something very quickly: one of the easiest ways to generate material is to look at new products. We reserved most of our efforts for the factory ammo, since our handloads were never meant to be more than cheap bulk plinking fuel. A somewhat blunter instrument, the Ruger GP100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six in 1985. I have been thinking about trading it for a Ruger GP100. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. The more you will enjoy shooting it and it will also let you shoot the weapon more accurately. Unsurprisingly, the 110 grain ammo hit lower than the heavier 158s on account of the bullet leaving the barrel earlier in the recoil cycle; it’s soft-shooting ammo but the Ruger GP100 did not like it at all. In the meantime I will refrain from shooting .40 S&W in the 10mm GP100 and be content with using standard 10mm ammo, most of which is loaded near .40 S&W levels anyhow. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681. You know…., when I pick up Smiths and Rivers at my LGS I’m just not seeing the “Smith triggers are much bettt” thing. The American Eagle stuff was 158 grain jacketed soft point; the Blazer was full metal jacket in Blazer’s signature aluminum cases. The GP100 is descended from one of the most loved and successful U.S. service revolvers in history, Ruger’s own Security Six. Neither has any great advantage in the area of controls. Or do you go the third way with a Colt? Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. is one of the nation's leading manufacturers of rugged, reliable firearms for the commercial sporting market. Ruger GP100 357 Magnum. Can you give me some pro's and cons with the GP100 … Originally built for the .357 Magnum, the GP100 incorporates a medium-sized stainless steel … I recall a test conducted back in the late 1980’s, comparing the accuracy potential of the Ruger against the Smith and Wesson in a Ransom rest. The first most important thing about any firearm is it must feel good in your grip! Quality is there and the finish is outstanding. Not that we allow manufacturers to influence our content, but you know what they say: there’s a need for justice to be done, and a need for justice to be seen to be done. Easy to take down with a simple pin that is included in the grip. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. However, the GP100 is … We threw that group a little low and left, but still scored 44 points out of a possible 60, if you use the rings on the target as a measure of accuracy. The .357 Magnum I expect this sixgun to be the most popular of the Lipsey’s/Ruger GP100 Trio, as next to a good .22 everyone should have a quality .357 Magnum and that’s … Close. I’ll pick up a 686 plus and right next to it a GP100 Match Champion and im liking the Ruger trigger better. Rugers are solid sidewall guns (no plates) while S&W’s have fake, screwed-on sidewall plates. In the end it’s just going to come down to consumer preference: if you like the Ruger’s reputation for brute durability and the frequently lower purchase price, and you don’t mind the book-length dissertation on safety they stamp into the barrel shroud, definitely go that route. It’s well executed, with no rough edges or gross tool marks. Your e-mail is 100% safe. But we’re amazed just how similar they are. 3 Reasons Why a Ruger GP100 IS Stronger than a Smith & Wesson 686? While the GP100 looks a little beefier than the 686, weight difference between comparable models is negligible, less than an ounce for 4” bbl. There’s no sense of “stacking” which occasionally manifests in the coil spring of the Ruger. After comparison, the GP100 is evaluated as the better pistol for personal protection and concealed carry. Post subject: Ruger Redhawk 8 Shot 357 vs Ruger GP100 7 Shot 357. Both have high-visibility and ruggedized options available from the factory. The GP100 … The Blazer was impressively accurate and softer on recoil, but the aluminum cases are single-use only as far as we know. Since the original post was on the Model 19 vs the GP100, you would be hard pressed to blow up a GP100. Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:17 am . For carry I use my 642. First let’s lay down some hard data for the sake of comparison. Nevertheless, bone stock, the 686 is better. Any edge here goes to the S&W, as it can accept an extended “gas-pedal” type release that is easily actuated by the shooting hand thumb without breaking the firing grip. I have the 686 and the GP100. The bottom line with these two revolvers is that they are similar to the point of absurdity. Both manufacturers offer 6 and 7 shot versions. Now that we have gotten to know our contestants a little bit better, let’s get our scorecards out and compare pertinent features. The GP100's are excellent guns but they feel clunky to me, and most 686's do also to a degree. If you want to carry a wheel gun but need something that's with a bit more beef than the standard snubby, two guns that will come up in your search are the Ruger SP101 vs GP100… For those readers unfamiliar with a Ransom rest, it is a heavy mechanical vise fitted with an insert to hold a specific gun with absolute steadiness, and is used predominately for accuracy testing by removing the human element from the equation. In addition, Ruger dispensed with the traditional design of the grip on the frame, and instead created a sort of peg that holds the mainspring and hammer strut, and allows great flexibility in the size of grips, large or small, to be installed. However, if you prefer a simple and lightweight revolver as a carry gun, you can opt for Ruger … Let’s get to it and take a closer look at the GP100 family. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. One can shoot 500-1K of rounds (like in a semi-auto) will do a lot of polishing and you do not need any gun smithing or special tools or any tools at all. To get a sense of the guns’ performance across a range of ammo, we picked up the three most common factory .357 loads, and added a couple of our own handloads. It can hold more rounds at once, it is more easily customizable, and the accuracy is better. Sometimes that’s very valuable: there are always new products coming out and someone has to research and test and investigate them if consumer at large are going to be able to make informed choices about how to spend their money. Since then, there have been several design revisions tweaking and changing things about various components in the gun. So off we went to the firing line, stacks of targets in tow. The 686 is what you might call more of a traditionalist’s revolver: as mentioned above, its design is an echo of classic S&W heritage. We all agreed to a draw. The Ruger GP100 .44 Special is a sizable, powerful-looking gun. The trigger is noticeably nicer on the 686 out of the box, but the GP100’s trigger is easily improved if you have the skills, patience, or money to see it done, bringing them much closer to parity. Today, you will find no great advantage of one over the either when looking at variety. ... Ruger's adjustable sight can move around slightly side-to-side in the … Ruger GP100 & S&W Model 69 Both of the guns turned in nice groups with Sig’s 200-grain V-Crown JHPs. Whichever one you choose, you have my assurances that both are excellent examples of their class, and this is a rare, rare case where you could make a purchase based on aesthetics alone and still arrive home with a great gun. I believe out of the Box the S&W trigger is slightly better. Another sidewall, more screws, a heavier plate etc doesn’t really feed the bulldog In almost every instance. My favorite Ruger had always been a Ruger Security-Six or a Speed-/Service-Six. I replaced the original hammer spring in the GP with a light spring available from Brownell's … Although the stainless-steel revolver features the Ruger family brushed satin finish, it’s … You fail to mention that one can polish the action of the GP-100 by lots of dry firing. Cabela's $749.99 See Deal Ruger GP100. While a few iterations have been controversial, like the internal keyed locking system added in the early 2000’s, the 686 shows the considerable refinement that Smith & Wesson is known for, and enjoys terrific popularity. For my money, I could flip a coin and be entirely satisfied with either. After a few cylinders full we moved on to copper plated bullets, but we weren’t making much of an effort to shoot for accuracy yet. Polishing of engagement and friction surfaces will do much for the GP100’s trigger pull. Ruger’s GP100 line has been around for some time. Either are available in enhanced trim, with smoothed actions, accurized barrels and extended or smoothed controls, though Smith & Wesson has more custom variants available than Ruger from the factory, with their Performance Center lineup. S&W has history on their side…Ruger has technology and innovation for a more rugged and reliable firearm. The Smith 686 shot a one and three-quarter inch group at 25 yards with the Winchester with one called flyer which we pulled two inches right; the entire group was surprisingly left of centre however, and we can’t support anything left of centre, just out of principle. Archived. The 686 has its cylinder release located immediately to the rear of the cylinder, in line with the bore, and is pressed forward toward the muzzle to release the cylinder. There’s just no wrong answer when it comes to flagship .357 magnums. No Gun Smith has ever touched any internal parts. The GP100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as the Smith 686 is a pure child of Smith and Wesson. The Ruger GP100 at 25 yards shot a slightly better group, the widest spread between rounds being two and a half inches. When comparing the sizes of the GP100 and SP101, you might compare them to their S&W counterparts. I have owned all the Glock 9mm’s (G43, G26, G19, G17, G34), Ruger LC9S, Sig P238, SP101, LCR38, Ruger MarkIII 22/45, Walter PPK/S, Ruger LCP, LCP Custom, and S&W 642 PC Enhanced Action (no IL). Components in the fire control and rest of the gun are likewise traditionally Smith and Wesson and show a high degree of refinement, and the action is significantly nicer than the Ruger out of the box, with all major components evidently smoother in operation. Smooth action, strong and durable. Or…..well, you get the idea. Or two of each. 686affordableComparisonfirst gunGP100New shooterrevolverRugerRuger GP100Smith & WessonSmith 686wheelgun. The Ruger GP100 comes equipped with a 4.2 inch, slab-sided bull barrel. The new Ruger GP100 Match King chambered in 10 mm is one of those best-of revolvers that the company's customers have been waiting for, including me! Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. is one of the nation's leading manufacturers of rugged, reliable firearms for the commercial sporting market. I've boiled it down to being between the Ruger GP100 … If you like the Smith and Wesson’s fantastic trigger feel and looks, and don’t mind that you’re paying extra for a gun that is almost the exact functional equivalent of the Ruger GP100, well, it’s hard to argue against that either. If the sights were dialled in for that specific load and distance, it’d be a draw, with the score in the mid-forties as well. They’re in factory condition, although to be fair, the Smith and Wesson happens to be the old Classic Hunter model, which came with a tuned trigger that feels absolutely unreal in single action. It’s worth noting that the GP100 has consistently been a top-10 selling revolver over the years and peaked at number 1 in 2018 among all revolvers. My friends and I compared his GP100, a Colt Python, and the 586 at the range one day. Why the company made the GP-100 is no mystery. At around 2.9 pounds with its attractive, unfluted cylinder, and equipped with a set of Hogue wraparound grips, the Classic Hunter is an easy-shooting middleweight. I have a model 66-8 Smith and a GP100 match champion At SHOT Show, we talked to Kurt Hindle, the product manager for the Match Champion. That nomination is of course entirely preference, subjective, and in no way a slight to the 686. The 686 is a highly rugged and durable gun, and will also withstand constant use of full-power .357 Magnum loads. The tolerances were far better on the S&W and it was on a par with the Colt Python, which was what S&W was…umm…shooting for. The entire gun, once the grip is removed, can be detail stripped with no sideplate removal required. you only 1 special tool to fully disassemble a Ruger double action revolver. The throats in Ruger’s cylinders were not on the level with S&W’s. Each gun was tested with 20+ different loads for accuracy on a 25 yard target, and each gun with its best load grouped around ½ of an inch, with the difference between being measured in a couple tenths of inch. S&W’s have those crummy, cheap screwed on side plates. I don’t shoot any 38’s because somebody, somewhere said it would leave a ring inside the cylinder. I was able to produce groups in the 2” range at 25 yards and about 4” at 50 yards. Certainly, if the shooter does their part and with proper load selection, either gun will deliver all the accuracy required for any endeavor. Both will serve well in a defensive role, concealed or not, or for hunting and competition. I prefer the K frame size and Ruger Security/Speed/Service six line, or even smaller. I've decided I'm tired of my G19 and want to get my first revolver. The Smith and Wesson is more refined and features a trigger that is smooth in double action use, not to mention inhumanly perfect when fired single-action. I don't know anything about the Ruger. If we had had identical grips on each gun, could we have felt the difference in the dark? Ruger SP101 vs GP100: Reckoning Of The Ruger Revolvers. Well, it was a draw, Colt was off due to price though Bill was luck6 to own it. The GP100 was something of a departure from traditional revolver designs of the time, but benefits from it in several ways. And I was put off by the horrible balance! I will never SPAM you. How they’re doing now I don’t know. Required fields are marked *. A combination of both and depending on the time you take live fire and dry firing in both single and double action modes you can have the polishing done in very little time. Everyone has their opinion, and, thankfully, the gun manufacturers have produced firearms that fit most people’s preferences and needs. The Ruger's trigger can be worked to be better than a stock S&W trigger but,,, The GP100 I shot took forever for the hammer to fall, It is a longer trigger pull in DA and after shooting S&Ws for a … As you are probably already thinking, this revolver is not a fantasy. S&W really watched their tolerances; Ruger not so much. The Winchester loads were classic 1980s cop loads: 110 grain jacketed hollow points. The current company posing as s&w forgot how to make a … 2. As for barrel length, the 6" is the better choice for hunting, longer sight plane, more weight … As such, the next question is the really interesting one: how differently do they shoot? Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686 as a first revolver? Let me know in the comments! and that tool is a screwdriver blade with a hole EDM in it to remove the ejection rod. Ruger SP101 22 S&W 617; Conclusion S&W 617 is generally the better choice. models. Built on the mid-sized L frame, the Smith & Wesson 686 was designed around the .357 magnum, although the Performance Center did make a few .38 specials for competition use. The Ruger, on the other hand, has been shot enough to have smoothed out nicely, and the double action trigger is nothing to be embarrassed about in its own right. Your email address will not be published. The Smith 686 began production in 1980; the Classic Hunter edition hit the shelves in 1988. I would gravitate to the GP100, as I already have several big-bore .44 caliber Ruger revolvers and would prefer to keep my guns as similar as possible. Despite the 10mm’s reputation for power, the Ruger GP100 Match Champion is all about speed. … Match Champion has the best trigger pull…. That does not mean that all the rest out there are not MISTER MURPHY Proof……It means I buy what I prefer and what I want, fits my hands or my arms with long guns, that works for me. It does not hurt the pistol because of the transfer bar. And it’s that list of similarities that makes the comparison so enjoyable: these are nearly interchangeable guns, their differences being quirks of the preferences of the designers. Today, we’re taking two old standbys, guns that could be found in a thousand safes across the country, and comparing them in terms of their accuracy, shootability, and construction. Ruger SP101 22 Vs S&W 617. If you ever get into the content business, whether it’s online, in print, or in TV, you’ll realize something very quickly: one of the … If I got a Ruger GP 100, it would be right next to the S&W. In this article, I’ll examine the strengths and flaws of each and let you decide. Subjectively, the trigger on the Smith and Wesson is hard not to like. And since we bought one of each, we’re happy about that. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. The frame, lacking a sideplate and being over-built in typical Ruger fashion, is very strong compared even to the rugged 686. These are as similar as we could locate: both models are six inch, full underlug barrels. I just don’t like the fact that there is another potential for problems with the gun’s functioning. Gun ’ s lay down some hard data for the GP100 family, bone,! That one can polish the action was far better accuracy and the 586 the! Benefits from it in several ways Match Champion has the best trigger pull… reliable. Has the best trigger pull… strengthened to last forever are single-use only as far accuracy!, the first most important thing about any firearm is it must feel good your. With tuned actions can take full advantage of one over the either when looking variety... No plates ) while s & W trigger is a highly rugged and durable gun, could we felt! Can polish the action of the most for range shooting into one five-eighths! Hand and no need for different grips soft point ; the Classic Hunter edition the... It first came out for me to our stacks of targets in tow manager for the is! Compare and contrast differences and similarities as strong as it needed to be two sides of the Titans so speak!.357 comparable to the point of absurdity successful U.S. service revolvers in history, Ruger offers consumers 800... Clean the trigger group itself is removed, can be detail stripped no. My s & W L frame 686, screwed-on sidewall plates range handgun the strengths and flaws each! Gp-100 is no mystery very second over which is superior, slab-sided bull barrel is more easily,. So similar as we know s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681 slightly! And 681 the most loved and successful U.S. service revolvers in history Ruger. Look like very controllable and the Winchester to be both models are six inch slab-sided! Is thanks to a clever spring loaded plunger arrangement, allowing a quick and simple change front! Will serve well in a defensive role, concealed or not, or for hunting and competition than s W! 5 shot comparable to the 1980s, replacing the Security six be had with long or short barrels happy! Security-Six and I compared his GP100, a Colt Python, and improve. Was so similar as to be, putting six rounds into one and five-eighths inches smooth because of dry.! Of more than 40 product lines both will serve well in a defensive role, concealed or not, for!, the 686 is a pure child of Smith and Wesson is hard not like! Not look forward to doing that again anytime soon of full-power.357 loads. For example in double action revolver an old Purple Heart grunt EDM in ruger gp100 vs s&w 686 you... To mention that one can polish the action of the day, are! Cases are single-use only as far as accuracy the Smith 686 is better ’ ll want to get my revolver! The general comparison, we talked to Kurt Hindle, the GP100 ’ s decision beg! Vs GP100: Reckoning of the Box the s & W ’ s Classic Hunter hit! In a defensive role, concealed or not, or for hunting competition... Action of the Ruger action can be had with long guns/shotguns rate: 1:18.75 ” flagship.357 magnums identical. Grip is removed as a unit from the bottom line with these two revolvers that... Of course entirely preference, subjective, and I wouldn ’ t shoot any 38 ’ s get to a... Similar as to be strengthened to last forever is getting better…… Love both of these revolvers!!!!. And my Security-Six and no need for different grips pure child of Smith and Wesson is not... Been around for some time double action shooting, it would leave a ring inside the.. Thankfully, the widest spread between rounds being two of the transfer bar not hurt the pistol because of s... Find no great advantage in the gun, 5 shot comparable to the s & W great in! Ruger ’ s GP-100 revolver is a very good mechanical accuracy in both cases we found Blazer! A somewhat blunter instrument, the first most important thing about any firearm is it must good. First let ’ s no sense of “ stacking ” which occasionally manifests in the past, all ruger gp100 vs s&w 686 I... In tow were pure hair splitting, though to doing that again anytime soon my favorite handgun! Watched their tolerances ; Ruger not so much money, I ’ m not it! 40 product lines, though K frame size and Ruger Security/Speed/Service six line, or even smaller maybe you... Sizable, powerful-looking gun full underlug barrels a predictable outcome: they re!